Polarization got us LGBT-bigots

The cult of gender ideology is the dark side of LGBT movement power. In the UK, it’s not a conversation, it’s dictation. They wield power: a movement and a group of ideologies, pretending the outcome is unproblematic or fair. A startling realization: the LGBT movement, after decades of fighting for legal rights, has empowered a narcissistic crossing of boundaries. Let’s not forget that its culture has a tradition of marketing, an organized system. GLAAD, HRC, NGLCC, and so on.

This has empowered gender ideology, the idea that sex doesn’t matter. Like a young man’s joke, a fallacy ignorant of the true director of biology: hormones rule all life, as do hormone disruptors. Human ideation, impulses, and behavior are strongly governed by endocrine hormones. Hormones, as all of body, from genes, on chromosomes. Biological sex, in Finnish sukupuoli, too.

As the most obvious negative arising from the ism of gender ideology are men in women’s spaces. These “trans women” are men, despite the edited bytes in government databases. The strongest woman in the world this year was a man, way bigger than any of the competitors. Unfair. And some of these men, identifying as trans, are in women’s spaces to abuse women, psychopathic predators, or to exploit the privileges available in these spaces, whether for benefits like athlete gaining funding. Or for the role-play, the autogynephilia.

Screw those female athletes?

How dare you criticize this ideology! Here comes the LGBT gender identity totalitarianism! I get a sense of sociopathy, crossing over boundaries in this manner, that is calculated and that is wrong. Sociopathy: is this what we really want in women’s sports?

It is an ism, I think. It is also marketing, in politics, in activism, and in business. Which makes observing this phenomenon easier. Without the systematic marketing, LGBT activist groups wouldn’t have succeeded. Here, I think they succeeded too well, unable to deal with the responsibility that comes with achieving the power of marketing.

Marketing

Lawyers market themselves as the human rights beneficiaries, all the while ignoring that men do not belong in women’s sports or dressing rooms, ignoring that stating facts about sex should be safe.

Companies market their LGBT friendliness, providing an avenue for dictating gender ideology. United in profiteering, leveraging this image-marketing, fully ignoring the harms. Their avenues provide LGBT arguments, but all other arguments are silenced.

Not just narrative, but a rule

A lot of it is simply narratives, in different institutions and media channels, and the problem with narratives of human language is the ambiguity, and the fact that the feelings a story evokes are completely remote from real-life phenomena. Don’t forget: the code of law is created based on the mostly fictional nonsense that different movements and activism marketing pushes.

The Problem

The participants in this ideology propagate an anti-conversation narrative. To me, observing others’ attempts at conversing about the negatives, they actively avoid open conversation. I really mean it: they do not want open conversation. They know these negatives will come to light, the fundamental problems, given we view society’s equity as attempting to provide positive and negative rights and freedoms. I believe all fanatic ism-ists, and all cults, share this property.

Anti-conversation

While facts can be fabricated and science can be marketing, not always and not perpetually so. The gender ideology appears to propagate certain common narratives, such as appealing to the fact that young trans people’s suicide risk. Yet, when really writing it down, they cannot accurately back up the claims with facts. It’s not real knowledge, but narratives for polarization. If I think you are not with me, I hate you. Jammiburger’s “bigot” parroting. Finnish lawyers not being able to converse about positive and negative rights.

Isms lie

The ism and cult hallmarks are present. A uniting story of external pressure, the enemy. Many of the stories lack historical context or factuality, or only have historical relevance today. Yet all this turns into polarization, which turns into demonization, which turns into authoritarianism, in the case of the UK, and violence at the street level.

The don’t tolerate your conversations

Mind you, this is now “the better” violence: they tell themselves that they don’t have to tolerate the intolerance. The joke is on them, as they tolerate the sociopathy in the disguise of minority rights, in sports, in prisons, in women’s spaces. Despite the good parts of the LGBT movement, it is still dishonesty, a lie, to pretend men are the same as women. This is crossing boundaries; it is a narcissistic aspect of these individuals taking advantage of privilege or delusion. Not to mention the fact that women deserve their women-only spaces.

Their lie is normalized

So now this idea that sex changes with a byte in a government database has been codified in the Finnish code of law. The mainstream political parties supported the LGBT movement, and now we are to lie that men are women, or women are men. A man can be pregnant, according to the Finnish state, which is an absurdity, or something a five-year-old would think. Which one are we? Absurdly pathetic, or on the intellectual level of five-year-olds? This actually isn’t either; this is power and politics. This is also a hallmark of authoritarianism, as material reality is ruled irrelevant in the code of law. Even a popular lie is a lie.

Have you ever attempted to negotiate with a very hungry person

As a case in point of hormones’ power. You find many people who do not support the material reality of hormones and sex. The same people fall under a hormone-spell every day. Without hormones, you wouldn’t wake up. Hunger-hormone, satiety-hormone, rebuild-hormone, thirst-hormone, and so on. No human is free, because hormones control the brain and ideation. Even if some populist politicians and uplifting LGBT marketing-made law imply that sex does not matter, it’s still a lie.

Individualism is an illusion

A person can truly reason about this once they lose the function of some hormone. The clarity could come after the hormone effects have waned, because of season or age, as a poetic metaphor. A narcissist will never be able to reason about hormones, as they can only project. A sociopath will mercilessly run with all the fallacies and illusions the human ego and individualist illusion generate.

Pro-LGBT hate is now a thing

With this normalization of gender ideology comes the new, “better” hate on the street. I am not sure how to better name it. Slander, disrespect, threats of violence, verbal and physical violence. To be fair, it’s probably often non-LGBT-identifying individuals, just as often as it is some passionate gay man or the trans-identifying. Most often, it is the intellectually young individuals following the gender-identity narrative as far as to ignore reality, follow the polarizing stance, up to childish slander, disrespect, threats of violence, and attacks, whether verbal or physical.

I thought this was what we were supposed to end here

No, it’s not even that. The narcissistic, “special” people don’t care about that; they love their privilege. They enjoy their power, and the people riding like this come out of the woodwork. The slandering gay man hates a man for calling a man a man. “You little prick,” said the man to a person wanting to converse. A hostile, domineering, disrespectful example of an LGBT member on the street. This is not “tolerance”; this is “intolerance.” This means that the person is a “LGBT bigot.” This is also narcissistic projection, not facing the negative that you carry inside but instead projecting this upon other people, who have nothing to do with it.

If you don’t fall in line

you will be slandered, smeared, and attacked. Pretending there are no problematic aspects, not willing to discuss the problem of men in women’s spaces, men in women’s sports, men in women’s prisons. Not willing to observe the negative aspects, viewing them as “normal,” unable to empathize with other people’s viewpoints. The powerless outlook, but this ism is at its peak popularity, not taking the responsibility of their power.

Is this the only inclusion they will allow, for men, in fact?

This also seems to cross over into misandria. Funniest outcome are the long lists of inclusion, but these lists do not include men. It's worth noting, that women are the largest identity majority, and this implies that the majority identity culture is misandrist in this respect. How could this not have an effect on some people psyche? But we are not here to look into the why.

In any case, the LGBT bigot doesn't operate on facts, anyway. The LGBT bigot brings polarized, condescending and bitter narrative.

People who cross boundaries and expect everyone to submit

Some people are narcissists. The man-hating woman on French national news, I’ve earlier looked into what caused the US Democrats to lose to the Republicans in the previous elections. At first, it seemed impossible, but I think I know why. As an event that symbolizes the dynamics, I remember watching French news about the forthcoming elections. The news panel had a US Afro-American woman, a Kamala Harris campaign supporter. She was openly hating on men and boys, propagating a misandrist narrative, sex-based hate speech as a campaign angle.

Peak LGBT is here

I think the pendulum swings in many directions, not just back and forth, like the young leftists dream, in a 17th-century Hegelian pipe-dream. I think we are at the peak of the LGBT movement. They have achieved what they wanted; they have crossed the boundaries, and it is evident across Europe. They permeated institutions with activism. Which other “ism” or interest group gets a free walk to push their agenda across occupational and institutional boundaries? Not even environmentalists are this high-profile.

Gender ideology is childish absurdity

They have become an absurdity, claiming to be for tolerance while seeding intolerance, crossing healthy boundaries, and ignoring their responsibility. And ignoring the true constraints in human life: biology, individuals sex and consequent hormones.

Combined with the human vulnerability to overestimating one’s ability and underestimating the challenges involved, we have arrived at a kind of LGBT totalitarianism, as normalized nation-state authoritarianism combines with normalized LGBT marketing jive.

Men can now be pregnant

In Finland, men can be pregnant, and the state pretends, that a persons sex can be changed with a byte in a government database. I doubt these concepts will find long-term support, as I think the public will laugh the politicians who normalized this out of office.